The Nation of America essays

The Nation of America essays In the articleCultural Imperialism? Is No Joke,? Jeffrey E. Carten states that Americans are not really care about the way they dominate other nations by exposing their values, ideas and products. He particularly mentions people in other countries have already tried to limit Americans? exports to their countries in order to reduce what Garten callsCultural Imperialism?. I agree with Garten that people in other nations think American culture is taking over their own cultures. Indeed, Americans have already created many negative problems in other nations especially in taking advantage in order to make profits, creating environmental problems and influencing others to follow Americanism. Many American corporations take advantage of other countries by paying low salaries and providing less benefits. There are many big U.S. corporations such as IBM, Intel and Microsoft which have migrated their factories to many developing countries since 1996. It is true that every company takes advantage in order to make profits. However, I do not like the ways American corporations are doing in other nations in order to make profits. They take the advantage of cheaper labors and avoid paying high tax and regulation fees in foreign countries. Although many foreign nations do not have laws that enforce enterprises to pay fringe benefits such as vacations, pension plans, health, and disability insurances, most local companies do provide housing and heath benefits for their employees. For example, my father who was an accountant worked at an administrative office in a local city of China and got housing benefit. The office provided a two-bedroom dormitory for us, but compared with my f riend who works for Intel in Shang Hai, China as an accounting auditor, my father was much luckier. She only gets paid 4500 Yuan ($563) per month without any other benefits. I know people who work in the U.S. as account auditors and their salaries range ...

Clinton and The Bill essays

Clinton and The Bill essays In 1993 William Clinton was fast at work trying to pull together legislation on National Service. National Service was a cornerstone of his campaign and he was determined to stick to his word and make it a priority. Clinton gathered a committee and tasked them to make National Service happen The Office of National Service headed by Eli Segal had a long road to travel. As Clinton promised in his campaign, he wanted to provide the financial opportunity to attend college to a broad range of young Americans in exchange for National Service. Along with the National Service legislation Clinton wanted to include a pay-as-you-can loan program that would encourage graduates to enter lower paying jobs such as teachers and police officers, which are more fulfilling and give back to the community and nation. From there the Office of National Service was off to build the framework for the legislation. They began analyzing the current system, and surveying local programs and organizations to see what would work, and how exactly Clintons campaign promise might actually become a viable piece of legislation that might make it through the congressional circus, not to mention the scrutiny of the private sector. After months of constant finagling, changing, assessing, tweaking, overhauling, appeasing and reassessing of the National Service legislation, the Office of National Service was convinced that it was ready to put in the hands of the public and Congress. On April 30th the plan was unveiled. That was when the real legislative process began. The National Service proposal was out in the open for all to see and the Office of National Service had to win over enough support to get the legislation through Congress. Winning over a few senators doesnt sound like a large task, but when it comes down to it party lines run deep and so do the affiliations with financial supporters and other supportive institutions. In short, in order to win ov...

Genocide and crimes against humanity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Genocide and crimes against humanity - Essay Example Considering all the case studies that he uses throughout his book Eric Weitz, highlights that although each of the cases has its own ‘particularities’ yet, all ‘display some notably common features’. Eric Weitz discussion concentrates on four different genocide cases, which includes the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge and the final case, which is the Former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The author of this established literature applies comparative methodology to the study of genocide. In looking at the Nazis case, Weitz leaves the reader with having to accept the notion that the author concludes the chapter with avoiding the ideology of whether he places his account on an intentionalist or a functionalist perspective. Weitz cleverly manages to do this through providing a compelling narrative that balances the role of the ideology and the circumstances in that particular case. However, from reading the fourth chapt er, which details the genocide in Cambodia, the author stands at a more modern functionalist account. This is evident by the way Eric blames the French interventionism, providing few of the Khmer Rouge leaders including Pol Pot ... and states how these in particular were fortunate to be able to get the western education of which gave them the position in the communism, stating that they were born in the society that already functions like that. The author tends to rely on the race and nation to emphasize on the discussion of genocide. A Century of Genocide uses UN convention to define the term Genocide. This chapter is excellent in terms of where it covers real situation of which in turn gives the reader the ability to understand different perspectives from real situations as a appose to only write what happened without using real life characters or situations. The author successfully manages to apprehend the reader on continuing to read through using quotations from other historian s, political actors, eyewitnesses and the use of poems. Unfortunately the author fails on many accounts on making his overall book of a first authors’ establishment, he misses the opportunity on expanding the alternative methodologies of research and rather heavily concentrates on the secondary research. Thus, making ‘A Century of Genocide’ provide very little new evidence or self-interpretation of the genocide events. Having to lack in his primary research the author misses out other crucial genocide regimes including the Rwanda case. Weitz acknowledges in his introduction that throughout his 5 chapters he presents very limited primary research. Critical bibliography 2: Benjamin A. Valentino, Final Solutions: Mass Killings and Genocide in the 20th Century. – Modern intentionalist Benjamin A., Valentino an associate Professor of Government and an author of Final Solutions: Mass killings and Genocide in the 20th Century, discusses in his well-established bo ok, the different genocide regimes that occurred during the 20th century, focusing on three types of mass killings, including the communist mass killings, ethnic genocide and the â€Å"counter-guerrilla† mass killing. Valentino, focuses on particular case studies representing each type of genocide, highlighting the mass killing in Cambodia, China and the